Author Guidelines
Publication Sections
Submission Workflow
Official Downloadable Documents
| Document or Policy | Available Format | Submission Status and Information |
|---|---|---|
| Article Template | Download .docx View PDF | Required format for the primary article manuscript. |
| Editorial Template | Download .docx View PDF | Reference document for the editorial process. |
| Statement of Originality and Ethical Compliance | Download .docx View PDF | Mandatory signed supplementary document. |
All submitting and contributing authors are required to comply with the journal’s editorial instructions, revision deadlines, production requirements, authorship responsibilities, and other post-submission obligations as stipulated in the Author Compliance Policy.
Reviewer Guidelines
Reviewers serve as the vital cornerstone of our academic integrity. We cordially request all appointed reviewers to uphold these structured evaluation parameters to maintain the distinction of the journal.
- 01
Role and Responsibility of Reviewers
Reviewers play a central role in maintaining the academic quality and integrity of Senarai: Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization. They are expected to evaluate manuscripts objectively, critically, and constructively, providing scholarly feedback that assists authors in improving the clarity, rigor, and contribution of their work. Reviewers must assess the manuscript solely on its academic merit, originality, relevance, and methodological soundness. - 02
Confidentiality and Ethical Conduct
All manuscripts received for review are confidential documents. Reviewers must not share, discuss, distribute, or use any part of the manuscript for personal, professional, or academic advantage. The content may not be disclosed to third parties. Any breach of confidentiality constitutes a serious ethical violation. - 03
Conflict of Interest
Reviewers must declare any potential conflict of interest before accepting a review assignment. Conflicts may arise from personal, institutional, collaborative, or financial relationships with the author(s). If a conflict exists, reviewers are required to decline the invitation to review to preserve the integrity and impartiality of the peer-review process. - 04
Scholarly Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers are expected to assess manuscripts based on the following criteria:- Originality and contribution to the field
- Relevance to the journal’s scope
- Clarity of research objectives and questions
- Theoretical framework and engagement with relevant literature
- Methodological rigor and appropriateness
- Quality of analysis, argumentation, and interpretation
- Clarity of structure, language, and presentation
- 05
Constructive and Respectful Feedback
Reviewer comments should be clear, specific, and constructive. Criticism must be expressed in a respectful and professional manner, focusing on improving the manuscript rather than judging the author. Reviewers should avoid personal remarks, discriminatory language, or dismissive statements. - 06
Timeliness of Review
Reviewers are expected to complete their evaluations within the agreed review period. If circumstances prevent timely completion, reviewers should promptly inform the editorial office so that alternative arrangements can be made. - 07
Recommendation and Decision Support
Reviewers are required to provide a clear recommendation, such as: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject. Recommendations should be supported by well-reasoned arguments and aligned with the detailed review comments submitted to both the editor and the author.
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to verify their submission's compliance with all of the following items. Submissions that do not adhere to these guidelines may be returned to authors.
- Originality & Exclusivity The submission has not been previously published, nor is it currently under consideration or review by another journal or conference.
- File Format & Template The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word (.doc, .docx), or RTF document file format and strictly follows the official journal template.
- Word Count & Language The manuscript normally contains 7,000–9,000 words and does not exceed 15,000 words. If written in Arabic or Indonesian, the Title, Abstract (150-250 words), and Keywords have been provided in English.
- Reference Style The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines (APA Style), and reference management software (Mendeley, Zotero, etc.) has been used.
- Ethical Compliance The signed Statement of Originality and Ethical Compliance is ready to be uploaded as a supplementary file during the submission process.
- Figures & Tables All illustrations, figures, and tables are placed appropriately within the text (or indicated clearly) and are submitted as high-resolution files if required.
- Author Identity Form A separate Author Identity Form has been prepared with complete and accurate information for every author, including affiliation, country, email address, academic identifier where available, contribution, author order, and Corresponding Author designation.
- CRediT Contribution StatementA complete CRediT statement has been prepared, assigning accurate contribution roles to every author and confirming agreement among all authors.
- AI Use DeclarationA signed declaration confirms whether generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were used and, where applicable, identifies the tool, purpose, affected content, and human verification.
- Author Compliance Agreement The signed Author Compliance Agreement is ready for upload, and all authors have read and agreed to comply with the Author Compliance Policy, including editorial, revision, authorship, production, and post-decision obligations.