Author Guidelines
Section Policies
Editorial OverviewEditorial
Articles
Book Review
| Essential Documents | Word Format | PDF Format |
|---|---|---|
| Article Template | Download .docx | View PDF |
| Editorial Template | Download .docx | View PDF |
| Original Statement | Download .docx | View PDF |
| No | Guideline Component | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Role and Responsibility of Reviewers | Reviewers play a central role in maintaining the academic quality and integrity of Senarai. They are expected to evaluate manuscripts objectively, critically, and constructively, providing scholarly feedback that assists authors in improving the clarity, rigor, and contribution of their work. Reviewers must assess the manuscript solely on its academic merit, originality, relevance, and methodological soundness. |
| 2 | Confidentiality and Ethical Conduct | All manuscripts received for review are confidential documents. Reviewers must not share, discuss, distribute, or use any part of the manuscript for personal, professional, or academic advantage. The content may not be disclosed to third parties without explicit permission from the Editor-in-Chief. Any breach of confidentiality constitutes a serious ethical violation. |
| 3 | Conflict of Interest | Reviewers must declare any potential conflict of interest before accepting a review assignment. Conflicts may arise from personal, institutional, collaborative, or financial relationships with the author(s). If a conflict exists, reviewers are required to decline the invitation to review to preserve the integrity and impartiality of the peer-review process. |
| 4 | Scholarly Evaluation Criteria | Reviewers are expected to assess manuscripts based on the following criteria:
|
| 5 | Constructive and Respectful Feedback | Reviewer comments should be clear, specific, and constructive. Criticism must be expressed in a respectful and professional manner, focusing on improving the manuscript rather than judging the author. Reviewers should avoid personal remarks, discriminatory language, or dismissive statements. |
| 6 | Timeliness of Review | Reviewers are expected to complete their evaluations within the agreed review period. If circumstances prevent timely completion, reviewers should promptly inform the editorial office so that alternative arrangements can be made. |
| 7 | Recommendation and Decision Support | Reviewers are required to provide a clear recommendation, such as: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject. Recommendations should be supported by well-reasoned arguments and aligned with the detailed review comments submitted to both the editor and the author. |
| No | Guideline Component | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Editorial Authority and Responsibility | Editors are fully responsible for managing the editorial workflow, including manuscript screening, reviewer selection, editorial decisions, and final acceptance or rejection. Editorial decisions must be based solely on academic merit, relevance to the journal’s scope, and compliance with ethical publishing standards. |
| 2 | Initial Manuscript Screening | Editors must conduct an initial assessment to determine whether a submission meets the journal’s scope, formatting requirements, and minimum scholarly standards. Manuscripts that are clearly outside the scope, violate ethical principles will be rejected at this stage. |
| Check | Requirement | Verification Details |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Originality & Exclusivity | The submission has not been previously published, nor is it currently under consideration or review by another journal or conference. |
| ☐ | File Format & Template | The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word (.doc, .docx), or RTF document file format and strictly follows the official journal template. |
| ☐ | Word Count & Language | The total manuscript length is between 7,000–9,000 words. If written in Arabic or Indonesian, the Title, Abstract (150-250 words), and Keywords have been provided in English. |
| ☐ | Reference Style | The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines (APA Style), and reference management software (Mendeley, Zotero, etc.) has been used. |
| ☐ | Ethical Compliance | The signed Statement of Originality and Ethical Compliance is ready to be uploaded as a supplementary file during the submission process. |
| ☐ | Figures & Tables | All illustrations, figures, and tables are placed appropriately within the text (or indicated clearly) and are submitted as high-resolution files if required. |