Civilising Mission or Colonial Experiment? Unmasking the Dutch Ethical Policy in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.0501/senarai.2025.1.4.218-235Keywords:
Ethical policy, colonial civilisation, colonialism, Aceh, new classAbstract
Debates in colonial and postcolonial scholarship continue to grapple with the question of whether colonial rule laid the foundations for the subsequent development of formerly colonised nations. Although many postcolonial critics have dismissed this notion, the Dutch colonial experience in Indonesia, particularly in Aceh, has not been sufficiently integrated into this wider debate. Scholarly consensus suggests that the Dutch Ethical Policy was not a purely humanitarian project but rather a response to chronic administrative inefficiency, influenced heavily by the Dutch military and political occupation of Aceh between 1873 and 1942. Since Aceh served as the testing ground for this policy, the present study examines its efficiency, role, and broader implications for Acehnese society. Building upon ethnological studies and the political advice of Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje (1857–1936), the Ethical Policy is best understood as a hybrid of conciliation and coercion, an authoritarian strategy intended to reinforce colonial dominance. Findings indicate that Acehnese elites who aligned themselves with Dutch authority were co-opted into promoting the so-called enlightenment mission, while those who resisted faced systematic surveillance, repression, and military violence. Moreover, the educational and infrastructural reforms initiated under this policy produced new social stratifications, where access to privilege and networks was increasingly unequal. Employing a qualitative methodology, this study analyses colonial newspapers, government reports, and official correspondence to illuminate the contested legacy of the Ethical Policy. It is anticipated that these findings will contribute a nuanced perspective to the study of modern civilization in both Aceh and Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Alfian, T. I. (1985). The Ulama in Acehnese Society. In A. Ibrahim, S. Siddique & Y. Hussain (Eds.), Readings on Islam in Southeast Asia. Institut of Southeast Asian Studies.
Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA) I.H.R. 00066/3208/006.
Beamer, C. R. (1975, July). “The Acehnese-Dutch War and its effect on the Acehnese people: Their land, customs and constitutions”, In Conference on Modern Indonesian History, Madison: Centre for Southeast Asian Studies.
Benda, H. J. (1958). Christian Snouck Hurgronje and the foundations of Dutch Islamic policy in Indonesia. The Journal of Modern History, 30(4): 338- 347. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1876034.
Bosma, U. (2008). De Ethische Politiek. De Indische School. http://www. tongtong.nl/indischeschool/contentdownloads/bosma_ethischepolitiek. pdf
Cribb, R. (1993). Development Policy in the Early 20th Century. In J.P. Dirkse, F. Husken & M. Rutten (Eds.), Development and social welfare: Indonesia’s experiences under the New Order (pp. 225-245). KITLV Press.
Deliana, Nia. (2018). Aceh and the Council of Eight in Penang 1873-1876. Insan ve Toplum: The Journal of Humanity and Society, 8(3): 74-91. https://insanvetoplum.org/en/issues/8-3/deliana
Dell, M. & Olken, B. A. (2020). The development effects of extractive colonial economy: the Dutch Cultivation System in Java. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(1), 164-203. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdz017
Flaherty, C. (2017, September 19) Is retraction the new rebuttal? Inside higher Ed, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/09/19/controversy-over- paper-favor-colonialism-sparks-calls-retraction
Furnivall, J. S. (1976). Netherlands India: A study of plural economy. B.M. ISRAEL BV.
Gobee E. & Adriaanse, C. (1990), Nasihat-nasihat C Snouck Hurgronje semasa kepegawaiannya kepada pemerintah Hindia Belanda 1889-1936. İndonesıa Netherlands Cooperation in Islamic Studies.
Hasjmy, A. (1969, March). Peranan Islam dalam perjuangan melawan Belanda. Sinar Darussalam, 12, 58-68.
Hurgronje, C. S. (1906). The Acehnese (A.W. S. O’Sullivan, Trans.). Brill.
Ismail, M. G. (1994). The late colonial state in Indonesia: Political and economic foundations of the Netherlands Indies 1880-1942. In R. Cribb (Ed.). The economic position of the Uleebalang in the late colonial state: Eastern Aceh, 1900-1942 (pp. 79-91). Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde (KITLV) Press.
Items from the Java Papers. (1873, June 14). The Strait Times Overland Journal, p. 3.
Items from the Java Papers. (1874a, May 16). Straits Times Overland Journal, p. 5.
Items from the Java Papers. (1874b, September 19). The Strait Times, p. 12. Items from the Java Papers. (187c, September 26). The Strait Times, p. 2. Kuitenbrouwer, M. (2014), Dutch scholarship in the Age of Empire and beyond:
KITLV- The Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Carribean Studies, 1851-2011 (H. A. Poeze, Trans.). Brill.
London and Achin. (1875, June 26), The Strait Times, p. 1.
Nederlands India News. (1886, July 12). The Strait Times weekly, p. 8
Neighbouring Countries. (1903, December 31). The Strait Times, p. 1.
Noor, F. A. (2017). The discursive construction of Southeast Asia in 19th Century colonial-capitalist discourse. Amsterdam University Press.
Proyek Ipal di Gampong Pande & Jawa dimulai sejak 2015. (2021, February 21). Retrieved from https://www.acehtrend.com/news/proyek-ipal-di- gampong-pande-jawa-dimulai-sejak-2015/index.html
Pusat Dokumentasi dan Informasi Aceh, (1977). Perang colonial Belanda di Aceh aka Dutch colonial war in Aceh. Banda Aceh: (n.p.).
Reid, A. (2005). Asal mula konflik Aceh: Dari perebutan Pantai Timur Sumatra hingga akhir Kerajaan Aceh abad ke-19. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Ricklefs, M.C. (2001). A history of modern Indonesia since, c. 1200, (3rd Edition). Palgrave.
Roff, W. (1985). Islam obscured? Some reflections on studies of Islam and society in Southeast Asia, Archipel, 29, 7-34. https://www.persee.fr/ docAsPDF/arch_0044-8613_1985_num_29_1_2215.pdf
Scholten, E. L. (1994). Dutch expansion in the Indonesian Archipelago around 1900 and the imperialism debate. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 25(1), 91-111. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20071619?seq=1
Siapno, J. A. (2002). Gender, Islam, nationalism and the state in Aceh: The paradox of power, co-optation and resistance. Routledge Curzon.
Sidel, J. T. (2003). Other schools, other pilgrimages, other dreams: The making and unmaking of jihad in Southeast Asia. In J. T. Siegel & A. R. Kahin (Eds.), Southeast Asia over three generations: Essays presented to Benedict R. O’G. Anderson, (1st Edition, pp. 347-382). Cornell University.
Sjamsuddin, N. (1982). Papers of the Dutch-Indonesian historical conference. In G. Schutte & H. Sutherland (Eds.). The ulama, the uleebalang, and the national revolution in Aceh (pp. 360-377). Bureau of Indonesian Studies under the auspices of the Dutch and Indonesian Steering Committee of the Indonesian Studies Program.
Sjamsuddin, N. (1985). The republican revolt: A study of the Acehnese rebellion. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS).
Tagliacozzo, E. (2005). Secret trades and porous borders: Smuggling and state along Southeast Asian frontiers, 1865-1915. Yale University Press.
Van den Doel, H.W. (1994). Military rule in the Netherlands Indies. In R. Cribb (Ed.), The late colonial state in Indonesia: Political and economic
Middendorp, W. (1929). The effect of Western influence on native civilization in the Malay Archipelago. In B. Schrieke (Ed.). The administration of the outer provinces of the Netherlands Indies (pp. 34-70). G.Kolff & co. foundations of the Netherlands Indies 1880-1942 (pp. 57-78). KLTIV Press.
Van Swieten, J. (1879). De waarheid over onze vestiging in Atjeh. Joh. Noman en Zoon. https://ia800209.us.archive.org/16/items/ dewaarheidovero00swiegoog/dewaarheidovero00swiegoog.pdf
Vissering, G. (1920). Muntwezen en circulatie-banken in Nederlandsche-Indie. Drukkerij En Uitgeverij J.H. Bussy.
Vickers, A. (2005). The modern history of Indonesia. Cambridge University Press
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Senarai: Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization Issues agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
