Civilising Mission or Colonial Experiment? Unmasking the Dutch Ethical Policy in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66236/senarai.2025.1.4.218-235Keywords:
Ethical policy, colonial civilisation, colonialism, Aceh, new classAbstract
Debates in colonial and postcolonial scholarship continue to grapple with the question of whether colonial rule laid the foundations for the subsequent development of formerly colonised nations. Although many postcolonial critics have dismissed this notion, the Dutch colonial experience in Indonesia, particularly in Aceh, has not been sufficiently integrated into this wider debate. Scholarly consensus suggests that the Dutch Ethical Policy was not a purely humanitarian project but rather a response to chronic administrative inefficiency, influenced heavily by the Dutch military and political occupation of Aceh between 1873 and 1942. Since Aceh served as the testing ground for this policy, the present study examines its efficiency, role, and broader implications for Acehnese society. Building upon ethnological studies and the political advice of Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje (1857–1936), the Ethical Policy is best understood as a hybrid of conciliation and coercion, an authoritarian strategy intended to reinforce colonial dominance. Findings indicate that Acehnese elites who aligned themselves with Dutch authority were co-opted into promoting the so-called enlightenment mission, while those who resisted faced systematic surveillance, repression, and military violence. Moreover, the educational and infrastructural reforms initiated under this policy produced new social stratifications, where access to privilege and networks was increasingly unequal. Employing a qualitative methodology, this study analyses colonial newspapers, government reports, and official correspondence to illuminate the contested legacy of the Ethical Policy. It is anticipated that these findings will contribute a nuanced perspective to the study of modern civilization in both Aceh and Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Alfian, T. I. (1985). The Ulama in Acehnese Society. In A. Ibrahim, S. Siddique & Y. Hussain (Eds.), Readings on Islam in Southeast Asia. Institut of Southeast Asian Studies.
Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA) I.H.R. 00066/3208/006.
Beamer, C. R. (1975, July). “The Acehnese-Dutch War and its effect on the Acehnese people: Their land, customs and constitutions”, In Conference on Modern Indonesian History, Madison: Centre for Southeast Asian Studies.
Benda, H. J. (1958). Christian Snouck Hurgronje and the foundations of Dutch Islamic policy in Indonesia. The Journal of Modern History, 30(4): 338- 347. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1876034.
Bosma, U. (2008). De Ethische Politiek. De Indische School. http://www. tongtong.nl/indischeschool/contentdownloads/bosma_ethischepolitiek. pdf
Cribb, R. (1993). Development Policy in the Early 20th Century. In J.P. Dirkse, F. Husken & M. Rutten (Eds.), Development and social welfare: Indonesia’s experiences under the New Order (pp. 225-245). KITLV Press.
Deliana, Nia. (2018). Aceh and the Council of Eight in Penang 1873-1876. Insan ve Toplum: The Journal of Humanity and Society, 8(3): 74-91. https://insanvetoplum.org/en/issues/8-3/deliana
Dell, M. & Olken, B. A. (2020). The development effects of extractive colonial economy: the Dutch Cultivation System in Java. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(1), 164-203. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdz017
Flaherty, C. (2017, September 19) Is retraction the new rebuttal? Inside higher Ed, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/09/19/controversy-over- paper-favor-colonialism-sparks-calls-retraction
Furnivall, J. S. (1976). Netherlands India: A study of plural economy. B.M. ISRAEL BV.
Gobee E. & Adriaanse, C. (1990), Nasihat-nasihat C Snouck Hurgronje semasa kepegawaiannya kepada pemerintah Hindia Belanda 1889-1936. İndonesıa Netherlands Cooperation in Islamic Studies.
Hasjmy, A. (1969, March). Peranan Islam dalam perjuangan melawan Belanda. Sinar Darussalam, 12, 58-68.
Hurgronje, C. S. (1906). The Acehnese (A.W. S. O’Sullivan, Trans.). Brill.
Ismail, M. G. (1994). The late colonial state in Indonesia: Political and economic foundations of the Netherlands Indies 1880-1942. In R. Cribb (Ed.). The economic position of the Uleebalang in the late colonial state: Eastern Aceh, 1900-1942 (pp. 79-91). Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde (KITLV) Press.
Items from the Java Papers. (1873, June 14). The Strait Times Overland Journal, p. 3.
Items from the Java Papers. (1874a, May 16). Straits Times Overland Journal, p. 5.
Items from the Java Papers. (1874b, September 19). The Strait Times, p. 12. Items from the Java Papers. (187c, September 26). The Strait Times, p. 2. Kuitenbrouwer, M. (2014), Dutch scholarship in the Age of Empire and beyond:
KITLV- The Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Carribean Studies, 1851-2011 (H. A. Poeze, Trans.). Brill.
London and Achin. (1875, June 26), The Strait Times, p. 1.
Nederlands India News. (1886, July 12). The Strait Times weekly, p. 8
Neighbouring Countries. (1903, December 31). The Strait Times, p. 1.
Noor, F. A. (2017). The discursive construction of Southeast Asia in 19th Century colonial-capitalist discourse. Amsterdam University Press.
Proyek Ipal di Gampong Pande & Jawa dimulai sejak 2015. (2021, February 21). Retrieved from https://www.acehtrend.com/news/proyek-ipal-di- gampong-pande-jawa-dimulai-sejak-2015/index.html
Pusat Dokumentasi dan Informasi Aceh, (1977). Perang colonial Belanda di Aceh aka Dutch colonial war in Aceh. Banda Aceh: (n.p.).
Reid, A. (2005). Asal mula konflik Aceh: Dari perebutan Pantai Timur Sumatra hingga akhir Kerajaan Aceh abad ke-19. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Ricklefs, M.C. (2001). A history of modern Indonesia since, c. 1200, (3rd Edition). Palgrave.
Roff, W. (1985). Islam obscured? Some reflections on studies of Islam and society in Southeast Asia, Archipel, 29, 7-34. https://www.persee.fr/ docAsPDF/arch_0044-8613_1985_num_29_1_2215.pdf
Scholten, E. L. (1994). Dutch expansion in the Indonesian Archipelago around 1900 and the imperialism debate. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 25(1), 91-111. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20071619?seq=1
Siapno, J. A. (2002). Gender, Islam, nationalism and the state in Aceh: The paradox of power, co-optation and resistance. Routledge Curzon.
Sidel, J. T. (2003). Other schools, other pilgrimages, other dreams: The making and unmaking of jihad in Southeast Asia. In J. T. Siegel & A. R. Kahin (Eds.), Southeast Asia over three generations: Essays presented to Benedict R. O’G. Anderson, (1st Edition, pp. 347-382). Cornell University.
Sjamsuddin, N. (1982). Papers of the Dutch-Indonesian historical conference. In G. Schutte & H. Sutherland (Eds.). The ulama, the uleebalang, and the national revolution in Aceh (pp. 360-377). Bureau of Indonesian Studies under the auspices of the Dutch and Indonesian Steering Committee of the Indonesian Studies Program.
Sjamsuddin, N. (1985). The republican revolt: A study of the Acehnese rebellion. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS).
Tagliacozzo, E. (2005). Secret trades and porous borders: Smuggling and state along Southeast Asian frontiers, 1865-1915. Yale University Press.
Van den Doel, H.W. (1994). Military rule in the Netherlands Indies. In R. Cribb (Ed.), The late colonial state in Indonesia: Political and economic
Middendorp, W. (1929). The effect of Western influence on native civilization in the Malay Archipelago. In B. Schrieke (Ed.). The administration of the outer provinces of the Netherlands Indies (pp. 34-70). G.Kolff & co. foundations of the Netherlands Indies 1880-1942 (pp. 57-78). KLTIV Press.
Van Swieten, J. (1879). De waarheid over onze vestiging in Atjeh. Joh. Noman en Zoon. https://ia800209.us.archive.org/16/items/ dewaarheidovero00swiegoog/dewaarheidovero00swiegoog.pdf
Vissering, G. (1920). Muntwezen en circulatie-banken in Nederlandsche-Indie. Drukkerij En Uitgeverij J.H. Bussy.
Vickers, A. (2005). The modern history of Indonesia. Cambridge University Press
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author Declaration, Copyright, and Licensing
By submitting a manuscript to Senarai: Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization, authors confirm that the submission is original, has not been published previously, and is not under consideration by another journal or publisher. The corresponding author confirms that all co-authors have approved the manuscript and agree to its submission. Authors are responsible for obtaining any required institutional approvals and permissions for the use of copyrighted third-party materials.
Authors retain copyright of their work without restriction. By accepting publication, authors grant the journal the right of first publication.
Articles published in Volume 1, Issue 1 through Volume 1, Issue 3 are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
Beginning with Volume 1, Issue 4 and for all subsequent issues, articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. Under this license, users may copy, distribute, and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given and derivative works are licensed under the same terms.
Authors may deposit, share, and disseminate the published version of their articles through institutional repositories, personal websites, and academic networks, provided that the original publication in Senarai: Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization is properly acknowledged.
Detailed information regarding copyright ownership, licensing conditions, and reuse rights is available in the journal’s Copyright Policy.